Bittrex Now Also a Target of a 100 Bitcoin (BTC) SIM Hack Lawsuit


Digital asset trade Bittrex is reportedly being sued over a SIM swap-related incident that allowed hackers to steal 100 Bitcoin (BTC), that are valued at round $1 million at present market costs.

The case seems to be fairly much like different latest incidents by which a dangerous actor positive factors management of a person’s cellular phone with a purpose to steal cryptocurrency from their on-line wallets. The swap was reportedly from telecom large AT&T, the funds have been withdrawn from Bittrex, and the hacker allegedly managed to achieve management over the person’s on-line identification.

The hack allegedly carried out in opposition to Gregg Bennett, an angel investor residing in Seattle, has not but been resolved by officers, as different incidents have earlier than being disclosed publicly in courtroom filings.

Bennett filed a lawsuit in Washington state’s King County Superior Court, by which he claims that Bittrex didn’t abide by its personal safety measures, whereas additionally failing to fulfill business requirements. This led to the high-stakes theft, Bennett alleged.

He additional famous that Bittrex’s administration didn’t take motion because the April 15, 2019 hack was going down. The trade didn’t reply in a well timed method, regardless that Bennett says he knowledgeable the corporate instantly.

The Department of Financial Institutions, the monetary authorized examiner for the Washington state regulator that addresses complaints from customers, said that Bittrex didn’t “take reasonable steps to respond” to Bennett’s message and “appears” to haven’t honored its personal phrases of service, in accordance to an August 30, 2019 letter.

Although a number of authorized entities have been knowledgeable, they haven’t but determined to take up prison costs within the matter. Moreover, the whereabouts of Bennett’s stolen digital forex are at present unknown.

Bittrex CEO Bill Shihara said the trade operator has carried out correct safety measures, which might successfully stop account hacks. These safety measures embrace two-factor authentication (2FA) and e mail verification when an unfamiliar IP tackle makes an attempt to sign-in to a person account.

Shihara famous that these “speed bumps” may result in a few person complaints, nonetheless, “they actually save a lot of accounts from being hacked.”

Shihara additionally warned that a person’s e mail also can get hacked, so a particular person’s cellphone shouldn’t be trusted because the final safety cease. This, as as soon as a sufferer’s cellphone has been taken over, hackers can normally get entry to all their accounts, Shihara defined.

He added:

“I think this is a problem that requires a lot of solutions and a lot of layers of security. And unfortunately one of the mantras that we use and often publish articles about is that ultimately you can’t trust your phone. You have to be aware that you could lose control of your phone.”

Bennett additionally believes that his hack was almost certainly “an inside job,” as he thinks that the PIN related together with his account and the social safety quantity linked to the account have been modified, which suggests that somebody at AT&T may have performed a function within the incident.

AT&T has not particularly been talked about in Bennett’s case, though it stays the main focus of comparable lawsuits initiated by Michael Terpin and Seth Shapiro.

Bennett’s case primarily focuses on the safety points on Bittrex’s buying and selling platform, however he acknowledged that the door stayed broad open. He warned:

“[AT&T] will not escape my wrath.”

AT&T consultant Jim Greer said he was solely in a position to repeat his earlier responses to the SIM-swapping incidents. That being, clients should not rely on their cell phones for the safety of their accounts.

Greer said:

“Fraudulent SIM swaps are a form of theft committed by sophisticated criminals. We are working closely with our industry, law enforcement and consumers to stop and prevent this type of crime.” 

Bennett famous that Bittrex’s administration ought to have been in a position to determine that one thing was not proper.

The safety breaches had been initiated from an IP tackle in Florida and from an NT working system, Bennett identified. He additionally talked about that he had not used both of them, which ought to make it clear that he was not the one attempting to achieve entry to the account.

Bennett claims within the lawsuit that the criminals stole 100 BTC from his account, which is the utmost day by day withdrawal permitted. He additionally says that the hackers offered off a important quantity of his crypto at below-market costs, whereas additionally changing the stolen funds into a additional 30 bitcoins and working off with it.

The hackers additionally got here again the subsequent day for 35 bitcoins that have been remaining, nonetheless, Bennett stated he had lastly managed to get Bittrex to shut his account and the unauthorized transactions.

Bennett’s lawsuit claims that Bittrex didn’t adhere to established business safety protocols in his case.

Bennett’s legal professionals stated Bittrex ought to have positioned a 24-hour withdrawal maintain following a password change, which is commonplace follow.

Bennett remarked:

“What I fault Bittrex for is their inability to see obvious suspicious activity.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here